Compare Local Pros

Bayside Roofing vs Tri Valley Roofing

East Bay Roofing Comparison · Updated January 2026

Bayside Roofing Tri Valley Roofing
Rating 1.0 5.0
Years Licensed 16 years 3 years
License # 939666 1100411
Workers' Comp ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
Bond Amount $25,000 $25,000
Location Castro Valley, CA Castro Valley, CA
Website baysideroofing.org www.trivalleyroofing.com

Our Analysis

Both Bayside Roofing and Tri Valley Roofing are based in Castro Valley, Alameda County, CA, and both list an active license status, indicating they are currently authorized to perform roofing work in California. Each company is reported to carry workers’ compensation coverage and to be bonded with a $25,000 bond, which can be relevant when assessing basic protections tied to jobsite injuries and certain contractual obligations.

A primary differentiator in the data is time licensed: Bayside Roofing is listed as licensed for 16 years, while Tri Valley Roofing is listed as licensed for 3 years. The review summaries also differ in focus. For Bayside Roofing, the provided feedback centers on a customer’s dissatisfaction with professionalism and communication, including difficulty getting responses after payment when following up about a roof leak. For Tri Valley Roofing, the provided feedback emphasizes professionalism and reliability, efficient scheduling, timely completion (including full replacements), and add-on work such as gutters, skylights, and solar tubes. Tri Valley Roofing’s feedback also highlights responsive communication, documentation with photos, attention to detail, cleanliness, and safety. These summaries reflect reported customer perspectives rather than verified outcomes.

Why choose Bayside Roofing?

  • Longer licensing history is listed (16 years), which may matter if you prioritize time in the trade.
  • Active license, workers’ compensation coverage, and a $25,000 bond are included in the provided details.
  • The supplied customer feedback raises concerns about communication and follow-through after payment, including a reported leak follow-up.
  • If considering Bayside Roofing, you may want to clarify communication expectations, warranty/leak follow-up steps, and response timelines in writing.
View full profile →

Why choose Tri Valley Roofing?

  • Active license, workers’ compensation coverage, and a $25,000 bond are included in the provided details.
  • Shorter licensing history is listed (3 years), which may be a factor if you weigh tenure heavily.
  • The supplied customer feedback frequently mentions professionalism, reliability, and timely scheduling/completion.
  • Reviews also describe clear communication, photos for documentation, and capability with add-ons like gutters, skylights, and solar tubes.
View full profile →

Get a Quote

What do you need help with?

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. The provided data lists both Bayside Roofing and Tri Valley Roofing with an active license status.

Yes. Both are listed as carrying workers’ compensation coverage and having a $25,000 bond.

Bayside Roofing is listed as licensed for 16 years, while Tri Valley Roofing is listed as licensed for 3 years.

The provided review summary mentions full roof replacements and add-on work such as gutters, skylights, and solar tubes, along with photo documentation and communication updates.

Data Sources: License information from California CSLB. Ratings and reviews from Google. Last verified January 13, 2026.

This comparison is based on publicly available information. We recommend getting multiple quotes and verifying all credentials directly before hiring.