Compare Local Pros

Bayside Roofing vs Roof By Tom

East Bay Roofing Comparison · Updated January 2026

Bayside Roofing Roof By Tom
Rating 1.0 4.8
Years Licensed 16 years 2 years
License # 939666 1112980
Workers' Comp ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
Bond Amount $25,000 $25,000
Location Castro Valley, CA Moraga, CA
Website baysideroofing.org roofbytom.com

Our Analysis

Licensing and compliance details are similar in key areas: both Bayside Roofing and Roof By Tom have active California licenses, carry workers’ compensation coverage, and list a $25,000 bond. The primary credential difference is tenure: Bayside Roofing reports 16 years licensed, while Roof By Tom reports 2 years licensed.

Their locations suggest different primary service areas. Bayside Roofing operates from Castro Valley in Alameda County and is described as serving Alameda County and nearby communities. Roof By Tom operates from Moraga in Contra Costa County.

Customer feedback themes differ. For Bayside Roofing, the provided summary describes a customer reporting dissatisfaction with professionalism and communication, including difficulty getting responses after payment when following up about a roof leak. For Roof By Tom, the summary describes customers frequently noting professionalism, efficiency, timely scheduling, clear explanations, and consistent communication from estimate through completion, along with job-site cleanliness. The Roof By Tom summary also notes that a small number of reviews describe dissatisfaction with specific outcomes or workmanship on certain jobs.

Both sets of information can be used as inputs when comparing responsiveness expectations, project oversight, and the importance of contractor tenure.

Why choose Bayside Roofing?

  • Longer licensing history (16 years) with an active license status, which may matter if you prioritize contractor tenure.
  • Based in Castro Valley and described as serving Alameda County and nearby communities, which may be convenient for local scheduling.
  • Lists workers’ compensation coverage and a $25,000 bond, which are practical risk-management details to confirm before work begins.
  • The provided feedback summary raises concerns about communication and follow-through after payment, including difficulty getting responses regarding a reported leak.
View full profile →

Why choose Roof By Tom?

  • Active license with a shorter licensing history (2 years), which may be a factor if you weigh time-in-business heavily.
  • Based in Moraga (Contra Costa County), which may be a better geographic fit depending on where the property is located.
  • Lists workers’ compensation coverage and a $25,000 bond, similar to Company A.
  • Customer feedback summary commonly emphasizes professionalism, efficiency, clear explanations, consistent communication, and job-site cleanliness, while noting some dissatisfaction on specific jobs.
View full profile →

Get a Quote

What do you need help with?

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. Both are listed with an active license status, workers’ compensation coverage, and a $25,000 bond.

Bayside Roofing is listed as licensed for 16 years, while Roof By Tom is listed as licensed for 2 years.

Bayside Roofing is based in Castro Valley (Alameda County) and is described as serving Alameda County and nearby communities. Roof By Tom is based in Moraga (Contra Costa County).

The Roof By Tom summary mentions full roof replacements, overlays, leak repairs, tile-roof repairs, and some gutter-related work. The Bayside Roofing summary focuses on a roof job followed by a reported leak and concerns about responsiveness.

Data Sources: License information from California CSLB. Ratings and reviews from Google. Last verified January 13, 2026.

This comparison is based on publicly available information. We recommend getting multiple quotes and verifying all credentials directly before hiring.