Bayside Roofing vs Apollo Roofing Company
East Bay Roofing Comparison · Updated January 2026
| Bayside Roofing | Apollo Roofing Company | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 1.0 | ★ 5.0 |
| Years Licensed | 16 years | 5 years |
| License # | 939666 | 1076767 |
| Workers' Comp | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bond Amount | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Location | Castro Valley, CA | Walnut Creek, CA |
| Website | baysideroofing.org | www.apolloroofingcompany.com |
Our Analysis
The main difference in the provided customer feedback is the reported service experience. For Bayside Roofing, the review summary highlights dissatisfaction related to professionalism and communication, including difficulty getting responses after payment when following up about a reported roof leak. For Apollo Roofing Company, the review summary describes customers commonly noting professionalism, responsiveness, organization, clear communication about estimates and options, efficient scheduling, tidy job sites, and follow-through including support after the main work and addressing additional items discovered during projects. Based on the data provided, the comparison is strongest on location, years licensed, and the themes in customer-reported communication and follow-through.
Why choose Bayside Roofing?
- ✓ Longer licensing history (16 years) with an active license, which may matter if you prefer a contractor with more time licensed in the state.
- ✓ Based in Castro Valley (Alameda County), which may be convenient for projects in Alameda County and nearby communities.
- ✓ Reports workers’ compensation coverage and a $25,000 bond, matching the baseline protections listed for the other company.
- ✓ Customer feedback provided emphasizes concerns about responsiveness and follow-through after payment, including follow-up about a reported leak.
Why choose Apollo Roofing Company?
- ✓ Based in Walnut Creek (Contra Costa County), which may be convenient for projects in Contra Costa County and surrounding areas.
- ✓ Licensed for 5 years with an active license; both companies list active status.
- ✓ Reports workers’ compensation coverage and a $25,000 bond, similar to Bayside Roofing on these items.
- ✓ Customer feedback provided commonly describes responsive communication, organized project handling, tidy cleanup, and support after completion, including addressing additional items found during work.
Get a Quote
What do you need help with?
When do you need this done?
Where should we send quotes?
Confirm Submission
By submitting, you agree to be contacted by a licensed contractor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Both are listed with an active license status, indicating they are currently authorized to perform roofing work in the state.
Yes. The provided data indicates workers’ compensation coverage for both companies.
Both companies are listed as bonded with a $25,000 bond.
The Bayside Roofing summary highlights concerns about professionalism and communication, including difficulty getting responses after payment when following up about a reported leak. The Apollo Roofing Company summary commonly mentions responsiveness, clear communication, organized scheduling, tidy job sites, and follow-through including post-project support.
Other East Bay Roofing Comparisons
Data Sources: License information from California CSLB. Ratings and reviews from Google. Last verified January 13, 2026.
This comparison is based on publicly available information. We recommend getting multiple quotes and verifying all credentials directly before hiring.