Bayside Roofing vs Acker Roofing
East Bay Roofing Comparison · Updated January 2026
| Bayside Roofing | Acker Roofing | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 1.0 | ★ 4.9 |
| Years Licensed | 16 years | 12 years |
| License # | 939666 | 993338 |
| Workers' Comp | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bond Amount | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Location | Castro Valley, CA | Concord, CA |
| Website | baysideroofing.org | ackerroofing.com |
Our Analysis
Geography is another differentiator. Bayside Roofing operates from Castro Valley and is described as primarily serving Alameda County and nearby communities. Acker Roofing operates from Concord in Contra Costa County; no specific primary service area is provided beyond its location.
The provided customer feedback summaries contrast in communication and service experience. For Bayside Roofing, the summary describes a customer’s dissatisfaction with professionalism and communication, including difficulty getting responses after payment when following up about a roof leak. For Acker Roofing, the summary describes customers frequently noting professionalism, responsiveness, clear explanations, thorough inspections, straightforward quoting, and jobsite cleanliness. It also mentions handling time-sensitive leak or storm-related needs, and coordination with other parties such as solar companies and permit inspections. These summaries represent reported experiences and can be weighed alongside licensing, insurance, bonding, and location when evaluating fit.
Why choose Bayside Roofing?
- ✓ You want a contractor based in Castro Valley with stated focus on Alameda County and nearby communities.
- ✓ You prefer a company with 16 years of licensing history and an active license status.
- ✓ Workers’ compensation coverage and a $25,000 bond are important baseline requirements for your project.
- ✓ The provided feedback summary includes concerns about responsiveness and follow-through after payment, which may be relevant if post-job support and communication are priorities.
Why choose Acker Roofing?
- ✓ You want a contractor based in Concord (Contra Costa County) with an active license and 12 years licensed.
- ✓ Workers’ compensation coverage and a $25,000 bond are important baseline requirements for your project.
- ✓ The provided feedback summary emphasizes responsiveness, clear communication, thorough inspections, and straightforward quoting.
- ✓ The summary also notes handling urgent leak or storm-related situations and coordinating with solar companies and permit inspections, which may matter for complex or time-sensitive jobs.
Get a Quote
What do you need help with?
When do you need this done?
Where should we send quotes?
Confirm Submission
By submitting, you agree to be contacted by a licensed contractor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Bayside Roofing and Acker Roofing are both listed with an active license status.
Yes. Both list workers’ compensation coverage and a $25,000 bond.
Bayside Roofing lists 16 years licensed, while Acker Roofing lists 12 years licensed.
Bayside Roofing is based in Castro Valley (Alameda County) and is described as primarily serving Alameda County and nearby communities. Acker Roofing is based in Concord (Contra Costa County). Location can affect travel time, scheduling, and whether the contractor commonly serves your area.
Other East Bay Roofing Comparisons
Data Sources: License information from California CSLB. Ratings and reviews from Google. Last verified January 13, 2026.
This comparison is based on publicly available information. We recommend getting multiple quotes and verifying all credentials directly before hiring.