Century Roof And Solar vs Mel's Roofing

For straightforward reroof projects on newer homes with predictable conditions, both contractors have the skills to execute quality work. The experience gap becomes meaningful when older homes reveal hidden damage, when unusual roof geometry requires custom solutions, or when permit issues arise that benefit from long-standing relationships with local building departments. Century's three decades also mean more completed projects to draw on when problem-solving unexpected conditions.

Not necessarily. Any qualified roofer can install a roof that accommodates future solar, and solar companies routinely work on roofs installed by others. The advantage with Century is coordinating both projects simultaneously to avoid duplicate mobilization costs and ensure the roof structure is engineered for panel loads from the start. If solar is years away, Mel's lower pricing for roofing-only work may be the better value.

Customer reviews suggest Century's higher quotes reflect their multi-scope capability, veteran-level troubleshooting, and comprehensive option evaluations that include system interactions beyond basic roofing. Mel's pricing is described as fair for focused roofing execution with efficient project management. The difference isn't necessarily about quality of shingles or workmanship, but about the breadth of evaluation and coordination included in the service.

Century Roof and Solar has direct experience coordinating solar removal, roofing work, and reinstallation as an integrated process, which reduces coordination risk between separate roofing and solar contractors. While Mel's could handle the roofing portion and coordinate with your solar company, Century's in-house capability streamlines scheduling, warranty coverage, and responsibility if issues arise during the transition.