Compare Local Pros
Faraci Painting vs Stewart Painting
San Mateo Painting Contractors Comparison · Updated March 2026
Stewart Painting brings 39 years of licensing versus Faraci's 15 years, but Faraci has extensive documented customer feedback while Stewart has limited review history.
| Faraci Painting | Stewart Painting | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 | ★ 4.7 |
| Years Licensed | 15 years | 39 years |
| License # | 963669 | 510578 |
| Workers' Comp | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bond Amount | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Location | Redwood City, CA | Redwood City, CA |
| Website | www.faracihousepainting.com | www.stewartpaintinginc.com |
Key Differences
What Customers Say
Faraci Painting
Faraci customers consistently emphasize thorough surface preparation, reliable scheduling and budgets, responsive owner communication, and attention to detail in finish work with daily worksite cleanup.
Key Takeaway: Faraci has substantial customer feedback documenting service approach and performance patterns, while Stewart's limited review history requires homeowners to conduct direct reference checks to evaluate current operations.
Customer Reviews
Faraci Painting
I had a fantastic experience working with Angelo and his team. Angelo, the owner, was incredibly responsive and professional from the very first message. He took my project seriously even though it w...
Angelo and the Faraci team were amazing! Communication was great. Project was on time, on budget, and the house looks great. Douglas was a great project manager and did incredible work on our proje...
Douglass and his crew did an amazing job. Their prep work was extensive and thorough. The crew clean up each day was exceptional. Do not hesitate to hire Faraci Painting
Stewart Painting
No reviews available
Consider Faraci Painting if...
- ✓ Your project timeline matters and you want documented evidence of on-schedule, on-budget performance with multiple customers confirming reliability
- ✓ Communication and project updates are important to you, as owner Angelo maintains direct involvement and customers consistently mention responsive contact
- ✓ You value thorough surface preparation and attention to detail, with specific customer feedback confirming extensive sanding, sealing, and finish work quality
- ✓ You're working on an Eichler or similar home where Faraci has documented project experience
Consider Stewart Painting if...
- ✓ Your property has complex historical issues or unusual substrate conditions where 39 years of diagnostic experience could identify problems newer contractors might miss
- ✓ You're comfortable evaluating a contractor primarily on licensing longevity and regulatory compliance rather than recent customer feedback patterns
- ✓ You prefer to conduct your own reference checks directly rather than relying on available review history
- ✓ Your project involves unusual circumstances where deep institutional knowledge of local building conditions over decades provides meaningful advantage
Questions to Ask Before Hiring
- → For Stewart Painting: Ask for at least three recent references from projects completed in the past year, and specifically inquire about their communication process and crew consistency
- → For Stewart Painting: Ask how long their current project manager and crew members have been with the company, given the limited visibility into current operations
- → For both companies: Request detailed scope of work documents that specify surface preparation steps, number of coats, and timeline commitments
- → For both companies: Ask about their process for identifying and handling unexpected issues like dry rot or substrate damage discovered during preparation
The Bottom Line
For most homeowners choosing this week, Faraci Painting offers lower decision risk with documented evidence of thorough preparation, reliable scheduling, responsive communication, and quality finish work across multiple recent projects. Their 15 years represents solid veteran experience for typical residential painting. Stewart's 39-year history provides deeper technical knowledge that could matter for complicated older homes, but the limited review history requires more direct due diligence on your part. If you need to decide quickly and want predictability, Faraci's documented track record provides that confidence. If your project has unusual complexity and you're willing to conduct thorough reference checks, Stewart's decades of experience could justify the additional research effort.
Get Up to 3 Free Quotes
Compare prices from licensed, verified contractors
Frequently Asked Questions
More experience provides advantages for diagnosing hidden problems and handling unusual complications, particularly on older homes. However, 15 years is substantial veteran-level experience for residential painting. The practical limitation here is that you can verify how Faraci applies their experience through customer feedback, while Stewart's recent performance requires direct reference checking.
Licensing and insurance establish baseline legitimacy, but don't tell you about communication responsiveness, scheduling reliability, or quality consistency. Faraci's documented patterns show exactly how they operate on recent projects. Stewart's limited review history means you're choosing based primarily on longevity without recent performance validation, which increases uncertainty.
It's a data gap rather than a warning sign—many quality contractors don't prioritize online reviews. However, it does mean you need to do more direct due diligence through reference calls to understand their current service approach, crew stability, and communication practices before committing.
Stewart's 39 years provides deeper diagnostic experience for complex issues. However, Faraci's customers specifically mention the company identifying and resolving dry rot during projects, demonstrating they actively look for and address hidden problems. Ask both contractors about their inspection process and how they handle discovered issues.
Looking for the Best?
See our ranked list of top painting contractors in San Mateo.
Other San Mateo Painting Contractors Comparisons
How We Compare Contractors
License Verification
All license data is sourced from official California CSLB records and verified regularly.
Review Analysis
Customer reviews are aggregated from Google and analyzed to identify patterns in service quality.
Detailed Comparison
We analyze credentials, insurance, experience, and feedback to highlight meaningful differences.
Not all licensed contractors are created equal. While a valid license is the baseline requirement in California, contractors can vary significantly in experience, insurance coverage, and customer satisfaction.
- Experience matters: A contractor with 15+ years of experience has likely encountered and solved problems that newer contractors haven't faced yet.
- Workers' compensation protects you: If a contractor without workers' comp insurance has an employee injured on your property, you could be held liable.
- Reviews reveal patterns: Individual reviews can be misleading, but patterns across many reviews often reveal a contractor's true strengths and weaknesses.
- Bond amounts vary: A contractor's bond provides financial protection if they fail to complete work as agreed. Higher bonds offer more protection.
Taking time to compare contractors on these factors can save you from costly mistakes and help ensure your project is completed by a qualified professional.
Data Sources: License information from California CSLB. Ratings and reviews from Google. Last verified March 12, 2026.
This comparison is based on publicly available information. We recommend getting multiple quotes and verifying all credentials directly before hiring.
Get in Touch
Have questions or feedback? We'd love to hear from you.