Compare Local Pros Compare Local Pros

Anderson Painting vs CMS Painting

Sacramento Painting Contractors Comparison · Updated March 2026

Quick Verdict

Anderson Painting brings 17 more years of experience and workers comp coverage, but CMS Painting shows stronger consistency in customer feedback themes.

Anderson Painting: A veteran contractor with 25 years of licensing and full insurance protection, though customer experiences show more variation.
CMS Painting: An 8-year contractor with consistent positive feedback for thoroughness and cleanliness, but lacks workers compensation insurance on file.
Note: CMS Painting does not carry workers compensation insurance, which could expose homeowners to liability if a worker is injured on your property.
Anderson Painting CMS Painting
Rating 3.9 5.0
Years Licensed 25 years 8 years
License # 792762 1037871
Workers' Comp ✓ Yes
Bond Amount $25,000 $25,000
Location Sacramento, CA Elk Grove, CA
Website www.anderson-painting.com

Need help deciding?

Get free quotes from both contractors and compare pricing.

Get Free Quotes

Key Differences

The most significant difference is workers compensation insurance: Anderson Painting carries it, CMS Painting does not. This matters because if an uninsured worker is injured on your property, your homeowner's insurance may be liable. Beyond insurance, Anderson Painting's 25-year track record means exposure to far more complex situations—hidden rot, substrate issues, and unusual surface conditions that come with experience. However, customer feedback reveals a meaningful contrast: CMS Painting receives notably consistent praise for thorough preparation, clean work practices, and timely completion, while Anderson Painting's reviews show more variation, with some concerns about worksite protection and completion standards. This suggests CMS may have tighter operational consistency despite less overall experience. The 17-year experience gap matters most for complex projects with older structures, while the insurance gap is a liability concern regardless of project type.

What Customers Say

Anderson Painting

Customers note punctuality and fair pricing as strengths, but experiences vary regarding worksite protection and project completion standards.

CMS Painting

Customers consistently praise thorough preparation, clean work practices, timely completion, and responsive communication across multiple projects.

Key Takeaway: CMS Painting demonstrates significantly more consistency in operational execution themes, while Anderson Painting shows broader variation in customer experiences despite longer tenure.

Customer Reviews

Anderson Painting

Mar 2021

Great company, high quality work and responsive to their clients needs. I highly recommend them after doing numerous projects with them.

Jan 2021

Best paint job ever.

Jan 2019

These are wonderful people and always great to work with. Punctual. Fair price. Couldn't ask for more. Thanks again.

CMS Painting

Jul 2025

CMS Painting truly excels in exterior house painting, transforming homes with a fresh and durable finish. Their attention to detail in preparation, from thorough cleaning to meticulous taping, ensures...

Nov 2024

Carlos and his crew were amazing! Very professional. Painted my interior walls. They look great. Cleaned up afterwards and moved my furniture. Highly recommend them. Thanks for a great job.

Jan 2024

CMS did an amazing job with our interior paint. They were not only fast but clean which we loved. Definitely recommend them for your paint projects.

Consider Anderson Painting if...

  • Your project involves older structures where 25 years of experience diagnosing hidden damage matters more than operational consistency
  • You want full insurance protection without needing to verify your homeowner's policy covers contractor injuries
  • You're willing to establish very detailed project agreements upfront given the variation in customer experiences regarding worksite protection
  • You value a quarter-century track record of sustained business operations in the Sacramento market
View full profile →

Consider CMS Painting if...

  • You prioritize meticulous preparation, thorough taping, and clean work practices based on consistent customer feedback patterns
  • Your project is straightforward residential painting where 8 years of experience is sufficient
  • You can verify your homeowner's insurance covers contractor injuries and are comfortable with that liability exposure
  • You value high owner involvement and responsive communication throughout the project
View full profile →

Questions to Ask Before Hiring

  • For CMS Painting: Ask to see proof of workers compensation insurance or confirm in writing that your homeowner's policy will cover any worker injuries on your property
  • For Anderson Painting: Ask how they protect existing surfaces and furnishings during work, and what their cleanup process includes at project completion
  • For both: Request references from projects completed in the last 12 months that match your specific scope of work
  • For both: Ask what their process is for addressing any concerns that arise during the project and how they handle final walkthroughs

The Bottom Line

If you have an older or complex structure and want full insurance protection, Anderson Painting's 25-year track record and workers comp coverage provide important safeguards—just establish detailed agreements about worksite protection upfront given variation in customer experiences. If your project is straightforward residential painting and you can verify your homeowner's insurance covers contractor injuries, CMS Painting's consistent feedback for thorough preparation, cleanliness, and timely completion suggests more predictable execution. The workers comp gap is the key risk factor with CMS that you must address before hiring. For most standard projects where insurance is resolved, CMS's operational consistency may outweigh Anderson's experience advantage.

Get Up to 3 Free Quotes

Compare prices from licensed, verified contractors

3 pros will compete for your business
Licensed & Insured
Top-Rated Pros
100% Free

Frequently Asked Questions

For straightforward interior or exterior repaints on newer homes, 8 years is generally sufficient experience. The 25-year advantage becomes meaningful when dealing with older homes where Anderson might better diagnose substrate issues, historic paint concerns, or unexpected complications. For standard residential work, CMS's consistent execution may matter more than Anderson's additional years.

This is a legitimate liability concern. If a worker is injured on your property and the contractor lacks workers comp, your homeowner's insurance may be responsible for medical costs and lost wages. Before hiring CMS, call your insurance agent to confirm your policy covers this scenario and whether it affects your premiums. Some homeowners accept this risk for contractors with strong track records, but you need to know your exposure.

Longevity doesn't automatically equal operational consistency. CMS appears to have standardized processes around preparation, cleanup, and communication that generate predictable customer experiences. Anderson's 25 years provides broader problem-solving capability, but the variation in feedback suggests less standardized site protection and completion protocols. This is why detailed upfront agreements matter more with Anderson.

Anderson's 25 years gives them more exposure to the wood rot, substrate failures, and paint adhesion issues common in older structures. However, you'll want explicit conversations about surface protection and completion standards. CMS's thorough preparation process is well-documented in reviews, but with only 8 years, they may have seen fewer complex substrate problems. Ask both for references from older home exteriors specifically.

Looking for the Best?

See our ranked list of top painting contractors in Sacramento.

View Top 10 Painting Contractors in Sacramento

How We Compare Contractors

License Verification

All license data is sourced from official California CSLB records and verified regularly.

Review Analysis

Customer reviews are aggregated from Google and analyzed to identify patterns in service quality.

Detailed Comparison

We analyze credentials, insurance, experience, and feedback to highlight meaningful differences.

Not all licensed contractors are created equal. While a valid license is the baseline requirement in California, contractors can vary significantly in experience, insurance coverage, and customer satisfaction.

  • Experience matters: A contractor with 15+ years of experience has likely encountered and solved problems that newer contractors haven't faced yet.
  • Workers' compensation protects you: If a contractor without workers' comp insurance has an employee injured on your property, you could be held liable.
  • Reviews reveal patterns: Individual reviews can be misleading, but patterns across many reviews often reveal a contractor's true strengths and weaknesses.
  • Bond amounts vary: A contractor's bond provides financial protection if they fail to complete work as agreed. Higher bonds offer more protection.

Taking time to compare contractors on these factors can save you from costly mistakes and help ensure your project is completed by a qualified professional.

Data Sources: License information from California CSLB. Ratings and reviews from Google. Last verified March 08, 2026.

This comparison is based on publicly available information. We recommend getting multiple quotes and verifying all credentials directly before hiring.

Get in Touch

Have questions or feedback? We'd love to hear from you.

Get Free Quotes